Are rash judgments better than well thought out decisions? In decision making, we often follow a guide, we go down a virtual list. We begin by weighing pros and cons, then talking things over with a friend or loved one. Finally, we draw a conclusion based on out past actions and experiences. In snap judgments that we make on the spot, with no reflection or thought beforehand, we do not follow such a methodical decision-making process.
Everything tells us that relying on quick judgments is unwise. This is because we have no time to sort through pros and cons, or reflect on past experiences. We still make such decisions, however. Though it is unwise, some say that snap decisions ultimately work out better than those which we give much thought.
In some situations, we need to rely on quick judgments, else we will lose our limited window of opportunity. For other times, it can be very important to make the correct selection, and this can be done over time. So is making quick decisions better than thought out judgments? It all depends on the situation and the opportunity.
If given the choice, take some time to go down the virtual list. Weigh the pros and cons, and ask someone for their opinion, then reflect on past actions and experiences. Figure out the best path and seize the opportunity.
Yes, thought out decisions are more reliable that rash judgments. But they each have a place. Sometimes, snap judgments work better in a situation than decisions that take time. In other times, it is the other way around. It really depends on the situation and the opportunity.
joyturtles 